NYU Community Engagement Discussion

IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING WORD LIMIT REQUIREMENTS:

Please note that each and every assignment has its own word limit.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NYU Community Engagement Discussion
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Community engagement (CE) is a process where a group of people from the same geographic proximity, special interests or similar circumstances work collaboratively and effectively on issues that are affecting them. Community engagement consists of various principles, such as community capacity, empowerment, critical consciousness, participation and relevance, and health equity. Community capacity is the characteristics of the community that affects their abilities to identify and address problems, also, this concept promotes unity. Empowerment promotes co-learning, integrated knowledge and action and the ability to gain mastery over their lives and the lives of their community through a process called social action. Critical consciousness is a consciousness based on the cycle of reflection and action toward social change and the involvement of cyclical and iterative processes. Participation and relevance depict the ideology of community organization starting where the people are from and promoting equality of individuals in their own priorities and ensuring cultural relevancy. Health Equity is the process of addressing inequitable conditions that create health disparities such as identifying social determinants of health (Glanz et al., 2015).

Community organizing (CO) is a process where groups of individuals mobilize to address common issues and take action toward the issues. Community building (CB) is the process of engaging and collectively building a community between the neighborhood and the people. These two models are sometimes looked at as one model and are used interchangeably and they are similar in that they focus on the principles of social action and social justice. CO is more power-based social change, therefore, those who practice CO believes that to produce or affect change, the community must create an organization that can modify and redistribute power. Whereas, CB is more relationship-based social change and those who practice CB believes building a strong, compassionate, and respectful relationship among the members of the community is more effective (Glanz et al., 2015) (Wolff, 2008).

An example of the community model effectiveness is a setting of a predominantly minority-based inner-city community, that is experiencing social determinants of health through prejudiced treatment by healthcare providers. The community engagement health equity principle is a good example of health intervention for this situation, such as addressing the inequitable conditions that are creating the health disparities and social determinants of health problems. Additionally, allocating resources to the community, and implementing mandatory training programs for healthcare providers on health equity (Glanz et al., 2015) (O’Mara-Eves et al. 2015). A model that is appropriate for this health behavior is the world health organization’s social determinant of health model which describes contributing factors to health disparities due to health inequalities and solutions for improving such situations (World Health Organization [WHO], 2010).

Reference

Glanz, K., Rimer, B. K., & Viswanath, K. (2015).Health behavior: Theory, research, and practice(5th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

O’Mara-Eves, A., Bruton, G., Oliver, S., Kavanagh, J., Jamal, F., & Thomas, J. (2015). The effectiveness of community engagement in public health interventions for disadvantaged groups: a meta-analysis. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 1-23. Doi:

10.1186/s12889-015-1352-y

Wolff, T. (2008). Power-based vs. Relationship-based Social Change. Retrieved from

https://www.tomwolff.com/resources/organizing_v_building.pdf

World Health Organization. (2010). A conceptual Framework for Action on the Social Determinants of Health. Retrieved from

https://www.who.int/sdhconference/resources/ConceptualframeworkforactiononSDH_eng.pdf

Respond to the bold paragraph ABOVEby using one of the option below… in APA format with At least two references and a minimum of 200 words….. .(The List of References should not be older than 2016 and should not be included in the word count.)

  • Ask a probing question.
  • Share an insight from having read your colleague’s posting.
  • Offer and support an opinion.
  • Validate an idea with your own experience.
  • Make a suggestion.
  • Expand on your colleague’s posting.
  • Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.

    It is important that you cover all the topics identified in the assignment. Covering the topic does not mean mentioning the topic BUT presenting an explanation from the context of ethics and the readings for this class

    Calculate your order
    Pages (275 words)
    Standard price: $0.00
    Client Reviews
    4.9
    Sitejabber
    4.6
    Trustpilot
    4.8
    Our Guarantees
    100% Confidentiality
    Information about customers is confidential and never disclosed to third parties.
    Original Writing
    We complete all papers from scratch. You can get a plagiarism report.
    Timely Delivery
    No missed deadlines – 97% of assignments are completed in time.
    Money Back
    If you're confident that a writer didn't follow your order details, ask for a refund.

    Calculate the price of your order

    You will get a personal manager and a discount.
    We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
    Total price:
    $0.00
    Power up Your Academic Success with the
    Team of Professionals. We’ve Got Your Back.
    Power up Your Study Success with Experts We’ve Got Your Back.
    Live Chat+1(978) 822-0999EmailWhatsApp

    Order your essay today and save 20% with the discount code ORIGINAL